Broodings from Bear - 2001

03/15/2001 | 05/28/2001 | 06/23/2001 | 07/11/2001
07/25/2001 | 09/13/2001 | 10/29/2001 | 12/02/2001

12/02/2001 - One Learns to Ignore Them

Photo by Leonard Balk: Barry reads bad review Boston Globe Yo Diehards!
My sole intent in reciting
Ms. Kaufman's pathetic blather at our show in Trenton was to create a moment of mirth for our audience. Her impotent little slap at us neither upset nor provoked me. Critics have about as much to do with the artistic process as I have to do with quantum mechanics. As a dear departed colleague of mine once stated so eloquently, 'critics perform much the same function as eunuchs at an orgy'.
Every artist who has been in the business for any length of time has his or her trunkful of bad reviews (or previews) and one learns to ignore them. They have no relevance to the artistic process, other than as footnotes or low entertainment. One of my favorite little reference volumes is "A Lexicon of Musical Invective", a piquant melange of venomous orts stretching all the way back to that talentless musical saboteur, Beethoven. A quick gloss of this little gem will give you some perspective on the value, insight and relevance of critics of all flavors. It becomes immediately and painfully obvious that although the power of the press as formidable as it is, has been able to damage artists, kill off careers and close shows, the carpers and misanthropes who run to snide have died unlamented and the music has lived on.
In responding to Ms. Kaufman's pissy little diatribe, I am afraid we have rewarded rather than chastised her. Journalists, more than anything else, live to be read, acknowledged and responded to. It is entirely possible that Ms. Kaufman believed that she was indulging in some sort of puckish journalistic humor, entertaining her faithful readership with a kind of 'bile lite' which is the stock in trade of an entire genre of hacks who, lacking the integrity to actually experience that which they are devaluing, take refuge in a faux cynicism that effectively hides their own lack of cultural diversity.
I actually agree whole-heartedly with Ms. Kaufman about the WWF, but I take issue with her use of the word 'saccharine'. Saccharine is an artificial sweetener, and anyone who has taken the time to attend one of our shows knows that, whether or not they agree with the sentiments in our music or have a musical beef with the harmonic structure of our songs, what's being presented is real; no tapes, no backup tracks, no elaborate production, pyro displays, video walls, dance ensembles or the ersatz angst that is a staple of formula-driven Rock. 'Sugary', 'sappy', or 'corny' would have been more accurate adjectives. She is right in maintaining that we are 'upbeat'. I guess that violates the ethos of an alleged rock critic. We're just not cool.
While what she wrote may have been offensive to some, it didn't prevent our concert from selling out, nor did it obviate the enjoyment of those who attended. I think our manager had the right idea. Rather than send her letters of reprobation, send her a bottle of Midol and a vibrator. That would be the kind, compassionate thing to do for a person so obviously miserable.
Peace,
bear

10/29/2001 - There is No Getting Back

I haven't written much since September 11th, but I've been doing a lot of thinking. And traveling. And singing. At first the traveling was terrifying and it felt rather unnatural and scary to be singing, or doing anything even vaguely celebratory in the aftermath of the attack that left us all permanently scarred. I realized, though, that making music was the absolute best thing I could be doing, that singing was going to help to heal me, heal our audiences, mend my tattered spirit and most importantly, feed that guttering flame of goodness that felt so faint, so nearly extinguished.
What can we do, what can I do to insure the continuing existence of good in an environment so dominated by fear, hate, aggression and intolerance? How can we survive spiritually in a time of war? When everyone is buying gas masks, rubber suits and bottled water and dreaming up worst-case scenarios for our collective fate, what are the possibilities for joy?
Ok, first things first. How can you consider joy if you're walking into walls? How to cope with the destabilization of our life style, the new and unwelcome feeling of constant vulnerability, the persistent, ugly ostinato underlying our daily lives, punching out the disheartening message that someone out there is out to destroy us?
For one thing, get rid, forever, of the idea of 'getting back to normal'. That will only torture you, piss you off and send you into an impossible maze of doublethink. There is no getting back. We have to move ahead and redefine normal. Things aren't going to be the same again, ever. Actually we are just catching up with 'what is'. We've been bludgeoned into reality, and nobody likes it much. I don't, but it's easier to accept it if I'm not continually pining for what was, because what was, wasn't. It was the product of our own massive denial about what's been going on outside and inside our own borders. So as much as it hurts, let it go.
Have you seen the bumper sticker (that inexhaustible source of folk wisdom) that mentions 'random acts of kindness'? They have to stop being random. In the week or two following the attack, New Yorkers were deeply and consciously kind to each other. As the city has settled into the next stages of Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome, that kindness has attenuated somewhat, but it is still a palpable thing in Manhattan. As individuals we have a very small and limited sphere of effectiveness in our actions, but collectively speaking, conscious kindness will help feed that flame of goodness. Doing kind things on purpose will help to offset the horrible counterweight of intentional malice with which we are beset. It helps to bridge the gap between individuals, grown deeper by the pervading fear sewn by terrorism. The ultimate triumph of terror is the isolation of individuals from each other, each cocooned in fear and paranoia.
They don't have to be big things, these acts of intentional kindness. Few of us can sit down and write out a six-figure check to the Red Cross. It's not for me to say what those acts may constitute for you, but you know the feeling in your heart when you stretch yourself even a small amount for someone else unasked. A word, a touch, whatever it is for you, magnified by thousands and millions, can insure that the force of good remains alive.
Make music. Make love. Make lasagna. Celebrate life in some way every day. Life is a fragile miracle and each day is precious, made all the more so as it is continually threatened.
Another thing you can do for yourself is to consciously limit your television news intake. I felt, in the week following the attack, as though I'd been gangbanged by the media. I thought that, if I were living in a primitive, non-technological society and I saw something horrific, I would see it but once. It would be burned into my brain and I'd remember it for the rest of my life. The awful moments of the planes slamming into the World Trade Center, the explosions, people on fire, plummeting through the air, the ultimate collapse of the towers were replayed hundreds, maybe thousands of times; full-screen, insets, dissolves, stills, fades, backgrounds. Each and every time I saw those images, I could feel myself in that strange paroxysm of sadness, grief and horror. And I couldn't break away. We were all victims battered, day after day, with absolute awfulness. It was the emotional equivalent of being sucker-punched again and again and being unable to duck. Now, with each new case of anthrax, each nugget of anything having anything to do with our 'new war', the news media continue to prey upon and stoke our fears. At moments I feel that, although I survived the physical attack on America, I may not survive the attack of the media pundits, their dire prognostications, useless conjecture and sensationalism.
I still feel the need to know what's going on, but once I have separated the information from the chaff of intrinsic hype so beloved of the media, I try to get on with my life. The boundary between hard news and fear-inducing idiocy has become nearly indistinguishable. Fear is a great paralyzer, and anything even approaching normal functioning is disrupted by constant fear. I am most emphatically not saying that it's better not to know what is going on, but reactive, fear-driven thinking is not living, and I adamantly refuse to stop living. There are two basic movements in the life force, expansion and contraction. It's one of those simple binary processes. You are either expanding into life or contracting into death, and the choice between the two is yours. If we are to do more than just survive, if we are to flourish and even once again find joy, the choice is obvious.
To all of you my deepest love and respect
bear

09/13/2001 - The Antidote is Not More Hate

Even the most prolix of us run out of words at some point. I have, and yet I feel the need to create something, something good in the face of this dark uncreation. Acts that beggar description, that leave us all as hollow leaden lumps; acts that threaten to blow out the candle of hope we hold against the night and fog of nameless dread; these terrible hammer blows to our collective spirit threaten us now in the aftermath. As we in New York sift through the mountains of rubble, we as a nation sift through the wreckage of our inner landscapes, searching for the strength to regenerate and propel ourselves into the next moment, uncertain as it has become. The absolute horror of the past two days has threatened to unsoul us all, to leave us a people in torment, thirsting for revenge on an epic scale.
I abhor violence. It makes me physically ill. Yet my blood is up, and I want to inflict deep and everlasting pain on those who hurt us all so indelibly. This is the beginning of the unsoulment process, the keen desire to wound, to kill. I have wept over the morning paper and the tv news. Part of my gut strains for vengeance in all its Biblical breadth. An eye for an eye, no, a thousand times a thousand eyes for an eye, and even that will not ease the ache in my soul, nor anyone else's. As this debacle has forced normally caustic and ornery New Yorkers to be their most humane, best selves, so should it affect us all. And our best selves want healing.
I hope with all my might that whoever perpetrated this calamity is brought to world justice, as this is a crime against the world. I am deeply afraid that, in our agony, we will lash out at those who share ethnicity with the suspects, those who share faith, dress and customs. My fear is not unfounded. Indeed, the sad litany of retribution against the blameless has already begun. Here, near ground zero, Arab-owned businesses have been vandalized and torched, their owners and employees harassed and harmed. In the equation of the human psyche, hate begets hate. We are an angry people now, a righteously infuriated people, and we are at a cusp. We can poison ourselves completely with that hate, or we can begin the laborious, counterintuitive process of defusing ourselves and healing the deep wounds created by hate. To counter a monstrous crime perpetrated in hate, the antidote is not more hate. Since that awful moment, which I can't even bring myself to iterate, I have felt inundated by a pox of hate, hate directed at all of us as a people, as a nation. The world feels heavy and pustulant with hate, and my best self is soul-sick with it. Despite my highest and best intentions, despite my prayers, I feel drawn to drink from that deep well of hate, and I know that to drink from that well is to drown my own spirit.
Soon we will sing again. And it will be good.

07/25/2001 - Why Aren't You Guys More Famous?

One of the most frequently asked, and most perplexing, questions to us is, "Why aren't you guys more famous?" It's not a bad question, and has goaded me to take a closer look at the phenomenon we collectively dub fame. In my introspection, I am haunted by the image of a painting from the Flemish school titled "The Anatomy Lesson". In it, a group of distinguished, well fed gentlemen, garbed in the style of the day, are standing around a corpse, partially dissected, laid out on a table. They seem to be discussing aspects of the various structures denuded by the knife. The atmosphere of the painting seems almost congratulatory, as though the attendees' thirst for knowledge of man's innermost mechanics has at last been slaked.
I have been flensing fame with similar results, the one glaring exception being that, upon peeling back the layers of hoopla, wahoo, and yada yada, fame is more like an onion than a corpse. At base, there is nothing there. Now before you start yammering, read on.
Fame comes in an assortment of flavors. There is the kind that legitimately accrues to someone who does something heroic- presumably the greater the deed, the more lasting the fame. Saving a tot from a burning building usually earns the hero a spot on the front page, a segment on the evening news, a medal and the eternal gratitude of the parents. Both the event and the hero pass from public consciousness within a day or so. Bringing medical supplies through an arctic blizzard to an isolated community's dying children will net you a statue in Central Park and a cartoon movie. Swatting a hard little ball with a stick with incredible power and accuracy will earn you a season of glory, or until someone else swats the ball more times than you did. Discovering the cure for a fatal ravaging illness naturally earns one a spot in history and medical texts, various humanitarian awards and a cure named for the discoverer. Notoriety, the tarnished side of the fame coin, is often the stuff of legends, which pass into the murk of collective consciousness and become bedtime stories handy for sowing nightmares in children and grownups alike.
Andy Warhol, in a prescient moment, said that everyone gets fifteen minutes of fame. On my dissection table, I've taken the scalpel to that statement and found that the fame to which he referred is simply media attention. What we commonly call fame is really the media spotlight, which is drawn, by its nature, to anything sensational. Peeling back the dermis of 'sensational', I find 'anything capable of sustaining a subnormal attention span for the two minutes of what passes for 'news' between onslaughts of commercials'. In the media's competition for viewers' eyeball hang-time, it has become necessary to put whatever the story du jour might be through a hypobaric process that mercilessly inflates the tale, its details and players, until it becomes 'newsworthy', that is, capable of sustaining byte-sized intellect. The alternative to this process is to comb the day's sorry catalog for the worst, goriest, saddest and most tragic events and grind them into our brains over and over again. On the rare day that nothing truly terrible happens, the archives are sifted for the anniversary of something truly terrible with which to titillate the passive receptor. The net result of this practice is that for an individual or group to be 'famous', i.e. receive more-or-less constant media attention, the image of that person or group must be constantly burnished, stroked, and hyperinflated in order to maintain its place in the voracious, jaundiced eye of the media. Failure to tend this image properly results in rapid consignment to oblivion.

The Nitty:
Caught in such an unstable tautology, those who are driven to capture and rivet public attention must hire pros to keep their images burnished, stroke and hyperinflated. These highly trained, well-connected professionals operate in the arena of Public Relations. They keep their clients, as their titles blatantly advertise, Related to the Public.
Wait a minute. Did you think it is some sort of bizarre cosmic coincidence that has a certain movie star's face on the cover of ten different magazines and on all the daytime and nighttime talk shows all in the same month, neatly coinciding with the release of her latest flick? Did you think it is because of our collective overwhelming interest in the private life of a rock star that MTV decides to do a feature on him at the same time as his latest album hits the stores? Did you really believe that topless photos of a supermodel pop up in the tabloid press just when she hasn't had a major magazine cover in four months? Is it an accident that a group's album sells millions in its first week on the charts after six months of merciless prerelease hype? Oh please, please tell me you didn't really - oh never mind. And all those paparazzi pix of who is wooing, screwing or suing whom - do you think they show up on page six on a fluke?

The Gritty:
Nope. Nope. Nope. They were all strategically placed by an army of flacks. That's showbiz lingo for Public Relations Persons, or more simply, publicists. Your basic Star Persona pays a flack or a battalion of flacks an average of about five g's a month in order to maintain this completely manufactured and often undeserved simulacrum of specialness. Even with my crippled math skills, that works out to about sixty big ones a year just to maintain a niche in the spotlight, just to maintain the ephemeral illusion we call fame; attention bought and paid for in cold hard cash. You have to have both a copious income and want the attention rather desperately to devote that hefty a chunk to insure that you are properly regarded and worshipped. Either that or some enterprise that has a large interest in maintaining your phony aura gives it up as a cost of doing business. One of my favorite passive-aggressive pranks is, upon being introduced to one of these glitzy folks who assumes that everyone knows Who They Are (cuz they've paid for it), pumping the proffered hand and looking earnestly at their face as though searching for a clue to their identity and saying, "Now what is it that you do?" The reaction is most gratifying. After the initial flash of existential terror, they retire to a corner, whip out the cell phone and spend twenty minutes cursing their high-priced publicist and screaming about greater market penetration. My favorite dominatrix, Lady Irony, sits at the bar watching this charade, showing cleavage and winking at the bartender, munching on egos and washing them down with double shots of Drano.

See Spot Spin. Spin Spot, Spin:
It gives me a vicious case of the giggles to think that anyone willing to pay the price can have this sort of fame. At base, it is completely valueless yet so many pay so much to maintain it. Part of the art of Public Relations is called Spinning, hence the term Spin-Doctors. Spinning can mean damage control, image inflation, image correction, or just plain lying. In the amorphous, amoral world of Public Relations, meaning has relation only to the speed and angle of the Spin. Is your client's public image sagging? Make him the Sexiest Man in America. Make him The World's Greatest Tenor. Make him something, for heaven's sake, that puts him back on the public's radar screen, whether it's truthful or not. If that doesn't work, put his latest escapade with an underage hooker in the tabloids, get a shot of him with his latest flame at a trendy watering hole on the society page, get him on E!; do whatever you have to do to get him out there. We can worry about the backlash later, but for now just get out there and Spin! The yokels will gobble it up and beg for more.
We've had a very spotty record with flacks. They have ranged from the insane to the ineffective, with a couple of real standouts that were incredibly good at the job and connected enough to make things happen. We haven't had the megabuck machine strewing rose petals in our path, but the few times one of those big guns went off on our behalf, wow. Things happened in a big hairy hurry. It was as if someone had stuck a Roman candle up our career and lit the fuse. But our industry is one that thrives on inertia. As soon as the initial momentum of one of those powerhouse eruptions is lost, it's like coasting through cold maple syrup. You slow down fast and gradually sink. Even your last air bubbles take a long time floating to the surface, if they make it. When they pop, they make a little noise that sounds like, "Whatever happened to…?"
So I return to my autopsy table and the disassembled remains of fame. Gimme those retractors and the bone saw. I've cracked the chest and can see right into the heart of it. Why aren't we more famous? The answer is right there, gelid and palpable. We can't afford it.

07/11/2001 - There Are Limits To My Arrogance

I recently received a response from someone incensed at some of my mouthings. This person labeled me as being both arrogant and puerile. I'd say he hit the nail squarely on the head. I am both. I don't think this person would get any argument from my band mates, my few friends, or even my mother. I am not quite so cavalier as to take this criticism as an endorsement, but the two qualities combined put me somewhere near the epicenter of the creative universe, as many artistic types display these traits to an extreme beside which I am as egoless and ageless as a Zen roshi.
My freshman English teacher, fed up with me and my arrogance and puerility, detained me after class one day with the intent of putting me in my place, since I'd had the nerve to differ with her rather passionately on a point of interpretation. After the rest of the class had shuffled out, she bade me sit so she could have the height advantage for the fusillade she was about to unleash.
After sputtering for a couple minutes, she got her feet under her and weighed in. She was a few decibels over the courtesy limit, bordering on hat-pin-through-the-tympanic-membrane hysteria, when she hit upon an alliteration that made my tender heart leap. Perhaps she'd been rehearsing it in her head since she'd made the decision to eviscerate me, or maybe it was just a flash of inspiration. Her lips flecked with spittle, she pasted me as 'snotty, superior and supercilious', the plosives dotting my face and shirt with little foamy droplets. I thought I'd died and gone to heaven, and the goofy little smile her moist hissy scathing engendered only angered her further. I certainly had no comeback for such an artfully arranged put-down. And she was right.
Arrogantly, I maintained that the point of disagreement between us was more germane to the conversation than her opinion of me, and that I was free to hold an opinion that differed from hers, which served to further empurple her already flushed visage. In a school where the students typically dozed through the academics, she had become unused to anything more challenging than the snores of the sleep-deprived and the vacant stares of whack-jobs for whom spoken language was a dark and mostly unfathomable mystery.
Fortunately for geeks like me, every noxious trait has a positive flip side. Focus for a moment on 'puerile'. The word, from the Latin puer, (pronounced poo-air) meaning youth, has come to mean boyish, childish, infantile, or trifling. No argument. It also connotes a darker, more primal process, something I associate with the Howard Sterns and Jerry Springers of the world. The plus side is a worldview that contains enthusiasm and hope, one that, although skewed, vectors toward faith and trust rather than hopelessness and cynicism. There is also something marvelously life-affirming about it in that it stubbornly refuses to knuckle to the gravitas of societal suffocation. I posit that many (puerile) artists actually are their inner brat. I never worry about pleasing my inner child, just the outer one. Please note that I am not defending infantile behavior, merely stating that puerility has a positive aspect.
Finding the upside of arrogance is a bit more challenging, but I believe that if there is anything good to be found in arrogance it is what I would call positively engaged willfulness. This may be discounted as mere puerile euphemism, but in order to sustain a life in the arts, especially those that place a person directly in the public eye, a bulletproof psyche is a must for those who would sustain the prolonged glare of public scrutiny. The excoriations that are the camp followers of high visibility can be incredibly cruel, and have in fact reduced many lofty egos to quivering apologies.
I'm not speaking autobiographically, darlin's. I have my fistful of bad reviews, but I'm talking a different level of torture. You know, the tabloids and the TV news. The positive face of arrogance is the ability to take the hits and keep moving forward, to take all the no's and hold the hope of a yes. I don't know if my existence would be possible without a modicum of arrogance. Obviously, I have no need of the six-inch armor plate variety that true celebrity seems to require, merely enough to counter the rejections and disappointments that are the bulk of the show biz diet. Indeed, arrogance helps us believe that our offerings have value. It is arrogance that says 'this is a good song' or 'this is a good painting' or 'my work has intrinsic merit' or 'I believe I have something important to say'.
It may be dismaying that I give credit to arrogance for an artist's conviction that his or her work merits consideration. I could call it deep inner conviction, artistic sensibility, or just plain chutzpah. Arrogance sounds ugly by comparison only if labels bother you. I believe the quality to be intrinsically neither bad nor good. It all depends on what you do with it.
I think arrogance is commonly construed to mean confidence with a bad attitude. That would be me. Then there's the lesser infraction, cockiness. Overconfident is a gray area somewhere between confident and arrogant and certainly incorporates cocky. Chutzpah could mean anything from confident to insufferable. Hubris is overconfident turned up to 11. It is way past arrogant. But what's the difference between a lot of confidence and a little arrogance?
Maybe it all has to do with the feeling behind the words. It's possible to call someone cocky in a friendly way, but it's hard to imagine arrogant as a compliment. When someone is said to have chutzpah, is that good or bad? Is overconfident just a spin doctor's arrogance?
Maybe I'm just casting about desperately for a way to rationalize my arrogance, since I'm stuck with it. I think it's one of those core traits that I can temper but not ever be rid of. Maybe it's arrogant to think I could change that much. In any case, I've discovered over a lifetime of dealing with it that it's better to be honest about it than try to pretend. I am always busted eventually.
To those put off by my flagrant abuse of obscure wordage, I beg a moment of indulgence. In my use of words not in the current colorless dismal popular vocabulary, I am not attempting to create an inflated image of myself, nor am I trying to confound anyone or covertly trying to improve the vascular fitness of my readers by causing them to repeatedly heft an unabridged dictionary. I have always found music in language and words. Aside from the obvious economy of using one big word instead of a spate of little ones, I love the sound of words as they skein through my mind's ears. The satisfaction of finding the mot juste is secondary to finding the music. When I was but a precocious tot, my favorite words were elevator and escalator, and not just because they were fun rides. I was in love with the way they reeled off the tongue and fell on the ear. I still get a kick out of words like tintinnabulation, partly for their onomatopoetic value but mostly for their musical worth. Words have a flavor, a heft, a value independent of their meaning. Edgar Allen Poe, whether you like his macabre writing or not, was in love with words in the same sense. His favorite phrase in the English language was 'cellar door'. He loved the sound of it. I'm not seeking to compare myself to Poe. There are limits to my arrogance.

06/23/2001 - The Way Things Work

Shaktipat upon the third eye of all those who rsvp'd my last posting. Your mostly encouraging, heartfelt, articulate responses gave me a lot to think about. The one common misapprehension, due I am sure to my murky prose, is that I was, in a roundabout way, asking y'all's permission to use profanity. Although that might be a logical assumption, what I thought I was doing, perhaps in retrospect, was investigating just how much latitude I may have in this venue before I hit whatever boundary exists, the 'here's where I get off this bus' stop for this site. Knowing me I wouldn't just cross the line, I'd obliterate it. Solution: Soon barrycarl.com will be a reality, thanks to Bob n'Ann, and anything that I feel is inappropriate for this web site, whatever that turns out to be, will be available there.

The Way Things Work:
Every now and then I try to explain some small piece of arcana surrounding our craft. To the uninitiated ours probably looks like an idealized sort of existence dominated by bonbon eating, indolence, block-long limo's, kowtowing minions, and interrupted by occasional flurries of vocal magnificence. It's not, except for the vocal magnificence part. And although we try to maintain a firm collective grip on the tiller of the wallowing scow of our career, we are far less captains of our ship than we are swabbies in the boiler room, urging the leaky, barnacled tub forward.
We've been getting a lot of mail lately from folks who are actually offended that Rockapella hasn't concertized in a nearby location. They think that we've done this on purpose; that we're ignoring our fans, that we choose when and where we sing, and our choices are driven by whim and personal preference.
That's not at all how it works, darlin's. Not at all. If it were, we'd have our own concert series at Carnegie Hall. I'd see to that. To explain the concert conundrum, I have to involve the music business, that shuffling, salivating, eternally voracious hydra. My apologies to all.

The Deal:
Concerts are put on, for the large part, by promoters. Promoters, like everyone else, are in business to make money. When they put on a concert, they are taking a financial risk. They are paying for the venue, the advertising, staffing the place for the night, and various other costs associated with putting on a show. They want to know that by the end of the night, they've recouped their nut and made a handsome profit. As a group, they are risk-averse. If they don't think that a group will draw a crowd, they won't book them.

The Catch:
Now how does a promoter know if a group will draw a crowd sufficient to fill his club/theater/concert hall/arena and thence his pockets? He does not go to a tarot card reader. He does not say to himself, 'Hmm. I like them. I think I'll call them and see if they'd like to put on a show in my place'. He looks at what's playing on the radio. He looks at who has the hit videos. He looks at the music industry rags to see what flavor of pop is being dished out and who is sucking it up. And we already know from other little bits of The Way Things Work that radio play, video play, and Hype In General are bought and paid for by the Big Labels. If a group has a big radio hit, the promoters stand in line and beg and plead. No radio hit, you stand in line and beg and plead with the promoters. Get it?

The Image:
A note about Big Hits: They are industry confections, whipped up in plush offices by teams of marketing and p.r. people. They've studied what you wear, watch, eat, think, and buy. They have had focus groups, opinion polls, demographic studies, and statistical analyses. They have figured out exactly what they think you'll go for, and their job is to take whatever artistic putty their label has signed and mold it into a megabuck franchise. The music side of the industry takes it easy on these teams of fluffers by making most of its output interchangeable. The groups look alike, sound alike, have the same dance moves, hair designers, and merchandise tie-ins at your local grease mart. So all the fluffers have to do is figure out which cookie cutter band has the best chance of going platinum in the first twenty minutes of shelf time. If they miss, well, a few pony-tailed heads roll, and the next band is served up.
The industry operates much like the Army Corps of Engineers. They look for projects that fit neatly into a formula, which can then be packaged on an assembly line and shoved up your ass as quick as they can stamp CD's. There's no room in there for groups that don't fit the box. This means that a lot of good, original music is relegated to the 'fringe' of the biz. The consequence of this sort of pre-apocalyptic corporate-industrial extrusion is the inevitable homogenization of popular music. Or more simply put; This is why there are so many xeroxes in every major category of pop music: Your basic sixteen-year-old butt-wiggling spandex-encased virgin diva, your basic four- or five-guy calisthenic boy-band, your basic pierced, tattoo-encrusted, goateed garage band, your basic pierced, tattoo-encrusted, goateed, leather-sheathed bad-boy metal munchers, your basic sexy-to-the-max, shrink-wrapped slinky girl trio, your basic good-'ol-boy/girl in a big Stetson and anything with fringe, and on and on ad nauseum.
The artists who rise to the top of this infernal doggie pile represent a small fraction of the spectrum of music-making in our fair land. A lot of really quality stuff goes begging (ahem). I am well aware that this sounds like a vat of fermenting grapes. It's not. It is The Way Things Work.
Our much-beleaguered agent and his staff have worn their designer jeans straight through to the bloody knees, begging promoters to take a roll of the dice on us. Our concert itinerary is a pastiche of hard-won dates, eked out of flinty, battle-scarred promoters by people with gifted tongues and the crazy courage that comes from having been to too many of our shows, seen too many smiley faces and standing o's.
Therefore, knowing what you now know, you can't possibly hold a personal grudge against us for not having come to your neighborhood - yet. Just remember that it could still happen. Our entire career has been one unlikely lucky break after another, and we still hold the hope in our collective heart that it will continue. We have managed to sustain ourselves even with the industry giving us a very frosty shoulder. Before we are consigned to the oubliette of history, we will have tried every back door, trap door, rat hole, secret passage, detour, and slightly ajar window in and around the biz. Some bands get MTV videos. We get commercials. Some bands perform at the Grammy's. We have a concert on PBS. Some bands appear on SNL. We had CSD. Our manager's forehead is, by now, nearly perfectly flat from continually smacking it against the brick wall of the biz, but as soon as the scabs from his last encounter heal over, he'll be back at it with a vengeance.

The Switch Up:
I am a man ahead of my time. Unfortunately I'm only about six months ahead of my time, which, given a Nostradamus-ish reference point, doesn't give me much time to appear prescient. Remember when I advocated the fusion of WWF wrestling and politics? About six months later, on the cover of the New York Times Week in Review, was a picture of Dubya and Al as wrestlers going at it in the ring. I think they called it something like 'political smackdown'. It sure took ya long enough, folks. You know how it feels when you're five minutes into a movie and you have the feeling that not only could you have written it, you can tell the person you're with everything that's going to happen, and to whom, for the entire movie? I see life that way.
Admittedly, six months isn't much lead time. I often feel like I'm squinting through a pinhole into the very near future, and more often than not the Lady sidles up to the other side of the pinhole and nonchalantly sticks her can in the way, totally obscuring my divination. Occasionally she realizes that it's more entertaining to watch me freak, and steps aside. Lately she's moved her JLo butt, and her little boon has been rewarded with the sight of me rolling on the ground, tearing my hair and babbling in tongues. I do that when the things I see stop making sense.

The Forecast:
Through the summer, I see gas prices gouging strip mine-size divots out of the American psyche. Detroit responds by building larger, less fuel-efficient cars. We tear up half the planet prospecting for another weeks' supply of go juice. Gas prices go higher anyway. As motorists become poorer, surlier and more frustrated, I (on my eco-friendly 50 mpg pony) will be invited more often by jealous SUVers to have coition with myself as I cruise by gas pumps and through hopelessly stalled traffic. Now although I can see all of this, I am frustrated at not having been given the gift of understanding any of it.
I don't know anywhere in the country that has a posted speed limit greater than 75 mph. Most places it's less. Nearly all of us drive cars capable of going more than twice the maximum posted limit anywhere in the USA, yet the cars we buy are getting ever larger, more powerful and gas-hungry, and that despite a fuel shortage. Are we in a bigger hurry than anyone wants to admit? Or is there something else going on here?

The Shell Game:
To begin with, cars are not sold. Images are concocted (just like for rock bands), and abstractly linked to vehicles. You buy the image and the car comes with it for free. This car will make you young, sexy, handsome, single, potent and rich. This car will take you to the exotic, romantic, uninhabited ends of the earth. This car will place you high above the masses, with wind in your perfect hair and a radiant smile of eternal satisfaction displaying your perfect orthodonture. This car will show everyone your impeccable taste, adventurous spirit, and genius IQ. Although, in reality, you are just some poor schlep being tormented into spending way more than you want to for transportation, sitting behind the wheel of your fantasymobile will magically morph you into the sleek model/stunt driver (do not try this in real world conditions)/yachtsman/gigolo/starlet/adventurer/banker/athlete pictured in the ads.
The interior is real leather with burled walnut paneling, the ride is smoother than caramello and the speedo peaks at an impressive 160mph. Wow. Half of that will land you in the pokey anywhere but a race track, but by now the speedway is rooted in your mind. Or: This thing is so rugged it can climb halfway up Everest without snow tires. Zowie! Or: Everyone will gasp and drop their drawers when you pull up in this one. Oooooh. Meanwhile, you've fallen for a very expensive rolling appliance that loses half its inflated value the second it leaves the lot, is ten times more machine than the rational person you fancy yourself to be needs, is guaranteed to break, and sucks gas like a sot sucks booze. But the image, the image!
I see a lot of images unraveling like a hand-me-down sweater in the next six months. As our auto makers gradually awaken and start to frantically backpedal on the ecodisasters they are rolling out of their factories, images will begin to shift, and yesterday's proud owner of the latest, largest icon to our collective hubris will be tomorrow's penitent, looking for something more economical than his bloatomobile, something more in line with his real life, rather than the image he's purchased, hoping to become. Who said that 'magical thinking' starts to disappear around age 8?
Dontcha think that the Lady laughs her throatiest, sexiest tee-hee when you're sitting in a traffic jam in your crate, and the guy in the quarter-mil V-12 next to you is doing the same 5mph as you, swirling in his own little fog of greenhouse gasses and quivering on the edge of a well-earned coronary?
Now, how ironic is it that this spew is coming from a gearhead? I'm not slamming cars. I love 'em. I grew up in the hard-core car culture of LA, where You Are What You Drive. Perhaps it was a prolonged gestation in that absurd environment that made me aware of the moronic transubstantiation we attribute to our vehicles.

The Revelation:
My tiny, tightly circumscribed future-view shows me another facet of this absurdist dramedy. It will shortly be revealed, after years of study, why cars are built, on purpose, to exceed all posted speed limits by wide margins. The answer is ridiculously simple, and it's not what the toothy, avuncular salesman is whispering in you ear. It ain't 'passing speed', and it ain't 'safety', much as you'd like to think it is (what with roll-overs, explosions, and such). In a time of virtue largely gone to seed, it makes us feel exceedingly virtuous to drive at (or near) the speed limit, knowing that we can leap into wild lawlessness at the touch of a pedal. Hey - before you snort derisively and get snot all over your keyboard, check this out: When was the last time you drove at the posted speed limit? Last time I tried, I ended up at the head of a long line of honking, bird-flipping, exasperated motorists, but boy did I feel virtuous. I mean, hardly anybody drives the speed limit. Which, by the way, means that most of us are breaking the law most of the time, but we've all agreed that it's ok (unless we get caught).
On the road I drive the most frequently, the 'consensus' speed limit is twenty-five mph over the posted limit. Driving the posted limit is an open invitation to getting run off the road. I've seen it happen. But one's virtue grows in proportion to the factor by which one can theoretically flout the law. If my fuel-sucking behemoth is capable of 150, I am, in principle, more virtuous going 55 than the slob going 55 in the lemon that can only do 90. That makes me a saint at the wheel, until I lose my meager patience and want to get somewhere fast.
What reasons, aside from the need to differentiate one's self in some superficial way from the rest of humanity, the need for escape, and knowing that you could do something truly wicked but you're just holding yourself back, could there be for buying something you don't really need, has performance parameters way beyond anything any of us with a class I license are allowed to do, costs more than most of us have on hand, and that could have adverse ecological consequences?
Well, there's the 'luxury motorcar' angle. You've worked hard. You've earned it. Your exalted status is confirmed, your conspicuous consumption has been sanctioned by the Work Ethic, a favorable lease program, and heck, Sting/Tiger/Michael did the ads. There's the 'new car smell' thing, which you can buy in an aerosol can and spray on any jalopy. There's the 'trouble-free' first few years. Yeah, right. The most recent reasoning; Geez, everyone's driving one these days, and I don't want one of those leviathans crawling up my trunk so I better get one, too. Let's make a case for paranoid, recidivist, knee-jerk thinking. It's like the advertisers have achieved their pernicious satori; to get us all conceptualizing in one-word ideograms: 'big', 'shiny', 'fast'. Duh. Pass me a new drool bib.
Of course there's the 'mine's bigger' angle, too. Since we appear to be obsessed with the 'bigger is better' philosophy, most of the planet has smirkingly stamped that as being stereotypically American. Maybe we should put the phrase on our dollar bills, replacing 'In God We Trust'. We seem to have more faith in Bigger. I'm pretty sure that many of us secretly worship Bigger rather than our religion's concept of the Deity. It's as if we think that by building bigger cars and homes, our egos will magically inflate to fill the spaces we've created for them. It actually happens, but the sad part of that equation is that we've mistaken ego for sense of self, which, because of the spiritual equivalent of a starvation diet, stays shriveled and miserable no matter how large a space we create for it. We have bought into image at the expense of the self. Ouch.

The Tawdry Truth:
A lot of us, myself unfortunately included, just like to go fast. Our lives are so carefully regulated and legislated that it's hard to find a daily adrenalin rush worth spit, and this one is generously proletarian. The biggest problem with this is that most simple-minded acceleration junkies are not trained to drive at extralegal speeds, so when oops comes to crunch they fall back on their panic reflexes, which make them do all the wrong things, causing them to mangle their bodies and turn their bright chariots to scrap.
But in our minds, ah, in our minds we're highly-skilled drivers with razor sharp reflexes and icy-calm dispositions, and knowing this to be our cherished image, motoworld happily sells us mightier machines. The feeling of hundreds of ponies thrumming under the hood is enough to launch most of us into a Walter Mittyesque Formula I hallucination. For that moment, even idling at a stop light in a 15mph zone, we are puissant (ironically the diametric opposite of pissant). Pulling three g's away from the light, the pressure on the pedal whipping the whinnying beasts that are pushing us deep into our race-molded contoured bucket seats, the tach jumping to the redline, a pair of smoking black streaks on the concrete and a miasma of uncarbureted fuel in our wake is the spike in the arm that keeps us turning out our pockets at the fuel pumps, the credit union, and searching for the reggie when we've been painted and busted.

The Admission:
Obviously I know it's stupid. But take the adrenalin rush and quadruple it for bikes. Say what you will about bikes making up for their owners' deficiencies. In my case you'd be right. I have a deficiency and I use my motorcycle to compensate for it. I can't go that fast without it.
I don't create solutions. I just foretell the soon-to-be present, and that doesn't take too much talent. Our persistent and annoying rejection of substance in favor of form, our addiction to image as opposed to reality leaves us very few options when it comes to action. That makes divination a snap. Present trends indicate that we are approaching a cusp at which point we will have a choice either to continue feeding our addiction to image, thereby denying what is in front of our noses, or to take the painful step of acknowledging the chasm between form and reality, thus initiate the process of healing the schism in our thinking.
From the way things appear through my pinhole, it looks as though we'll opt for image when the moment arrives. Collectively we'd rather play pretend than face what we've created. I wish it weren't so. Please remember not to shoot the messenger. Thanks.

05/28/2001 - Just sit back and watch the Lady boogie

You'd think, with a nearly gig-free month, that I would have time to write at least one lousy little posting. But in order to think that, you would have to totally discount the nature of the Third Inescapable, Irony. I have come to believe that, in the Ironic Realm, one's free time decreases in ratio to the paucity of performances. Those of you who appreciate the exquisite damascene sharpness of Lady Irony (couldn't possibly be a guy - we're too dull-witted) can laugh with me on this one.
So, as Lady Irony would (and does) have it, I haven't written squat. I've tried. I want all you darlin's to know that I've made a number of desultory attempts at sequential cogent verbiage, only to end up with a mélange of vomitus worthy only of that little gray key named Del. Del and I have become good buddies lately, as I fill page after page with upchuck, pointless effluviua and garbled histrionics. All the while, Lady Irony has been bumping and grinding and rolling her eyes as she struts her catwalk up there between the dissociated lobes of my brain. Oh, and laughing a sort of hyena-like cackle every time I reach for Del.
This is a good start. Del hasn't called out to me for even a little tickle. Quick! Hit Save! This shall be known as Doc. Del, you ain't gonna get Doc. Tough luck, Lady.
This month marks the longest hiatus we've had from our feverish schedule in a decade. I have had a chance to reacquaint myself with some of the things I love but haven't had time for in forever, like cooking. The kitchen is my playground, and I haven't had the leisure to romp in it for a long time. I find myself whipping up soufflés just to amuse myself and stun a family grown used to freezer treats. Whipping egg whites is also a lot better than flagellating myself or growing increasingly angst-ridden as I watch the corporate feeding-frenzy that lately constitutes our national news. But I don't even want to go there. That's an open invitation to Del. I've found that great food temporarily mitigates that penny-in-the-mouth metallic taste of hopelessness that's become a familiar accompaniment to the eleven o'clock news. 'Nuf.
I've had to balance my revived passion for haute cuisine with my deeply narcissistic attachment to hardbody culture, so I have taken this windfall of 'free' time to hone my martial arts skills. I've quickly become a hard-core kickboxing junkie, a coldly efficient middle-aged killing machine. Actually I suck at it, but it rewards me with an endorphin rush that feels like a mainline jet fuel injection. It also helps that, aside from the teacher, I'm the only guy in the class. Of course I stand in the back. Call it inspiration. Call it Lady Irony massing her commandos and shaking her sweaty booty in my face. Hey, whatever. It works.
In a life without balance, the ordinary becomes extraordinarily precious. Things like mowing the lawn become sacred moments of calm; events that restore order to a disordered and painfully lopsided existence. I get a lot of letters asking what I do when I'm not out on the road with Rockapella. Well, for a month I've had a life. Don't get me wrong. I love singing. I love doing concerts and all the other stuff that we get to do, but the issue of balance has become more pressing as I've had less and less of it. None of us have been delighted at the lack of gigs this month, but I feel like I can embark on the next round of madness with a little more emotional ammo than I've had in a long time. I saw a great bumper sticker the other day. Sometimes I think that most of the profound wisdom of the ages can be encapsulated in a fistful of bumper stickers. This one said, "Life begins when you get one".
I hear Lady Irony's stiletto heels clicking on the terrazzo. She's tap dancing on our career today. We are getting a spate of inquiries from Europe and more far flung exotic locations. Our latest CD is flying out the doors of every major music emporium in America. Our concerts are sellouts. Our fans are loyal, raucous, and wonderful and their legions are growing daily. And if we pooled our resources we could maybe buy a pizza provided we didn't order extra toppings.
You are probably asking yourself how this could be, given the rosy glow surrounding us. It's like this: Just as Zool rides shotgun when we're on the road, Lady Irony seems to have a death grip on the frayed coattails of our tenuous career. When I bother to think about it, I realize that she's always been there. Sometimes she's hiding in the wings, and I can just barely get a whiff of her musky pits, and at the height of her glee she's doing a full-bore flamenco, drilling those pointy heels right into my skull and licking her wickedly arched eyebrows. In other words, that's just the way it is. She came with the deal; she's having a great time and she's not planning to go away and pester some other band. Why should she? This is too cool and way too much fun.
She is the reason why parents groan and glance heavenward when their offspring come to them with shining eyes and announce that they want to have careers in the arts. They stop seeing a hopeful child, and instead see a future deadbeat sponge that'll suck up their IRA's and loll around the house 'til some time in their mid-40's. My poor dad, a musician himself, did his best to dissuade me from my dream. It obviously didn't work. Lady Irony had her paws over my ears and a wicked leer on her greasy lips way back then.
I don't want to sound like I'm badmouthing the Lady. As with most things in life, there's a penalty, or at least a consequence for that. She does have an upside, the caveat being that you must possess both a scintilla of humor and a finely tuned sense of the ridiculous to see it. It also helps if you can detach and look at your situation from an Olympian remove. Just sit back and watch the Lady boogie. It's better than a banana split, cuter than a boxful of puppies and more bitter than vetchweed, all at the same time. That's a lot of bang for your one remaining buck. At the very least you'd have to say she's entertaining.
Our management is constantly being ping-ponged by the Lady. They have to run interference, be our firewall, collection agency, wet nurse, shortstop, skipper, heavy bag, travel maven, herder, and at the same time puff hard enough to keep the faltering airfoil of our career aloft. They are forever stuck in the Boolean jam-up that we create simply by existing. And they can't seem to find a place to settle down. Their office moves more frequently than a traveling circus, so we've completely given up on business cards. Now we just hand out little maps of greater Boston with a pushpin jammed into the current coordinates.
This is good for me. I thought I was too pissed off ever to write again for a 'family audience'. Ok, so maybe I use a few off-color words and some suggestive imagery. Get over it. I got a letter not too long ago from a mother who was offended by some of the words in one or two of our songs, and felt they weren't appropriate for her toddler. I was worried until I sat down and accidentally watched WWF wrestling for about two minutes. Geez. The noxious puerile garbage spouted in thirty seconds by one of those hoarsely emoting, badly scripted meatbags completely buries the few words and phrases that pop up in our songs. This is the intersection where family audience and artistic license have fender-benders.
We have done a great job, somewhat unwittingly, of hoisting ourselves upon our own shiny petard. Wee ones like our music, and every now and then, when it's appropriate, a more mature word or phrase finds its way into our otherwise parentally-approved lexicon. We didn't start out to be a group that appealed to children, and we watched with horrified fascination as our prime vehicle for exposure vaulted us into the limelight shared by the likes of Penelope Leach and Raffi. All of a sudden we couldn't say what we say the way we say it because we had to be responsible to our audience. And then, oh my god, we became daddies ourselves and it was an ISSUE. Lady Irony was doing a fandango in a thong with a big feather boa and a lubricious grin.
It takes more self-control than I possess to stick to the squeaky clean high ground. It strains my system to the max to tone down my prose, constantly searching for a way to say what I feel without completely compromising myself or offending that imaginary reader who I know is out there but won't make himself or herself known until I cross that Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval boundary that exists in the steely watchful eye of prurient America. Sometimes my hands shake as I grope for Del even though I know I've committed the perfect translation from my gut to my word processor, but it's liable to raise hackles somewhere. I pray that I don't choke on my own milquetoast.
Bottom line: I need your help here. I need feedback. I am weary of second-guessing. I'm trying to avoid physical therapy for a repetitive strain injury from reaching for Del while bent into a psychoemotional pretzel. How much high-test can you take before I get the next deluge of indignant scoldings? Lemme know. If I put a parental advisory notice at the top of the page, would that help? Something like, "Danger! Thought-provoking material ahead. Read at your own risk." Something like that? I'm even ready to admit that this may not be the proper forum for my vitriol. Maybe I should find a place to put it out that won't have the possibility of reflecting poorly on Da Boyz and have a negative impact on all the CD sales we're not getting paid for. Maybe I should start using a pseudonym? I have some good ones picked out, of course, but if I tell you then you'll know who it is and then my clever pseudonyms are useless. As you can plainly gather, I'm facing a dilemma, and neither horn looks like an attractive place to park my butt. RSVP.

03/15/2001 - Who unpenned the canines?

I enter the new millenium with a single question burning in my brain, a question asked over and over by an octet of nervously gyrating musicoterrorists, a query screamed over and over in unison on a single note; who, who, who unpenned the canines? This may well be THE question for the dawning of the next thousand years. In all its unprepossessing simplicity, in its total lack of melodic content, rhythmic finesse or musical sensibility, it eloquently encapsulates what is perhaps the quintessential perplexity of our time. Who indeed? Unlike Ives' "Unanswered Question," Copland's "Quiet City" or Mahler's "In Diesem Wetter," this question, stated repetitively, incessantly, and with unrequited ardor calls upon us to examine nothing as we move into the existential uncertainty of our global future.
Obviously I am suffering from a bad case of the winter blues and I can hardly wait for Persephone to make her return trip from her winter vacation in the underworld, or the French West Indies, or wherever the hell she goes this time of year, the lucky beatch. You don't know how happy I will be when I see her shaggy head rematerialize. It will mean that the long, terrible winter of '01 is drawing to a close. Even more tensely awaited than the annual appearance of that stinking traitor rodent Punxatawny Phil, I anticipate 3/20 like a slavering starving mongrel mutt waiting for a sirloin to fall off the barbecue.
That isn't to say that it hasn't been an interesting winter. Oh, it has. My mondo blondo experiment came to an abrupt end a couple of days ago when, during a severe attack of cabin fever, I cut off all the yellow stuff and reverted to my salt and pepper buzz. Interestingly enough, I instantly felt smarter and could write again, but I seem to be having somewhat less fun, which is frightening because I didn't believe I could have less. The truth is that I couldn't bear the thought of putting caustic substances on my head again and listening to the sizzle as my scalp fried. Maybe I'll try again after I forget what an ordeal it is. Besides, I needed a break from mousse, hair spray, and all that other useless crap that takes up room in my suitcase and occupies such a valuable chunk of my preconcert preening, time when I should be ironing.
I had been fretting for weeks about the next incarnation of the 'do. I got some thumbs up for the blond and some down. Some of my buds were rankin' on me, calling me Lars or Gunter. Our manager said I looked like an assassin, but maybe he was talking about my suit. Should I let it grow out, and go through the humiliation of the interminable 80's pouff stage? Should I sauté my head again? The looming prospect of a hair decision was more than my already shaky system could handle, so I folded and plugged in the trimmer.
Did I say that it's been an interesting winter? I misspoke. Miswrote. Whatever. It sucked. That is, it is still sucking. Winter has been in full suck mode since right after Christmas, when what began as a beautiful, lyrical snowfall ended up turning my 'hood into Siberia. It was charming and eerily beautiful and then everything froze. It was no longer charming or beautiful. The formerly enchanting snow was now an oppressive and remorseless assailant, and it whupped my ass. I was way up on a swaying ladder in an arctic wind, chipping ice out of the frozen gutters with a cocktail ice pick clutched in frostbitten fingers when my faculty of thought went cryo on me, and I was afraid that it would never thaw. I thought my synapses had ceased firing for good and all, and it was time to get a slave gig at the 7/11. So I hunkered down next to the hearth for a couple of months, practiced pouting in a mirror and thinking up dumb names for my appendages. I didn't start to function again 'til sometime last week, but that was before the latest parade of winter storms marched through my yard, reburying it and turning it into my own little patch of tundra. I feel like a suburban Ahab, stomping about my deck cursing the whiteness and waiting for hope to put in a guest appearance.
Another factor in my emotional deep freeze was that even though I was left stunned and gasping after the election, and my brain was partially frozen it occurred to me that our fans come in all shapes, sizes, colors, persuasions and political affiliations, and I don't want to alienate anyone in particular. I don't mind irritating everyone equally but I don't want to be guilty of the kind of polarization I openly criticize. There's just no point. Why pour gas on a fire, especially with fuel prices up. So don't be looking here for any violently partisan commentary about the s***** b****** who s**** the election.
It's been a rotten winter for motorcycling, and I know it shows. I see it most in the pattern of my thoughts. They fall into a downward spiral that thus far seems to have no bottom. The bike is my primary weapon in the war against the mind rot that oozes to the surface. The wind just rips it right off my body. Right now it's sunny but it doesn't matter because the instrument of my salvation is lying in a thousand pieces scattered around my mechanic's shop floor. It's starting to show its age by having various expensive, hard to get at parts poop out at bad moments, events that further agitate my agita. The depths of winter without the wind-peel provide my mind an unparalleled chance to marinate in its own funk. Did you know that fat-free blue cheese dressing tastes like dog barf? Don't believe me? Try it yourself. I am that unfortunate creature torn between blue cheese dressing lust and diet shame, and hoping naively to balance those irreconcilable opposites I turned to the fat-free ersatz versions. Due to a malignant gustatory synchronicity they all taste like dog barf. From my very limited experience, real blue cheese dressing doesn't taste anything like dog barf. I bet the salad dressing manufacturers secretly hate blue cheese dressing (or its more upscale, alphabetically transposed relative, bleu) because of its foreign origin and, revived by our collective heady new jingoism decided to strike a blow for our good ol' Hidden Valley Ranchers (a little dressing humor for the cognoscenti, not a militia joke) by making all their products uniformly vile. That's my Stupid Conspiracy Theory for the true millennium. I'll admit that its principal flaw is that there are many people for whom regular blue/eu cheese dressing tastes like dog barf.
Maybe it's a snob thing, but I couldn't hop on the funeral train for Dale Earnhart. True to the roots of Nascar, which began when bootleggers in hot cars tried to outrace the cops, he refused to wear even a regulation helmet, which I doubt would have saved anyone in a 170 mph t-boner. His opaquely sunglassed, stolidly macho image, which used to stare down at me from soda machines at Home Depot, has now graced the covers of numerous mags, and of course I've seen the fatal crash reverently replayed dozens of times as the media tries to satiate our unquenchable appetite for gore. We are a strange people. We go to the races for the crashes, and then feel guilty when we get what we came for. How about the 14-year-old shmuck who threw a six-year-old girl across a room cuz he was practicing "pro wresting." Listen folks: Kids do what they SEE. Not what they're told. We are a very violent society, and we pretend not to be by being horrified at the violence we generate, like all of a sudden we become sensitive and delicate and swoony at the sight of blood. We revel in it, albeit semi-secretly (or so we think). Car wrecks, pantomime gladiators and prime time news are all part of the sanguinary mechanics of titillation. The School Shooting of the Week is another manifestation of our manic absorption with violence. So don't get that "Home Alone" look and wonder where it all came from. Don't like it? Take some responsibility and change yourself. Stop patronizing violence on any level. Don't watch violent shows. Don't go to violent movies. Don't buy products from advertisers who use violence in their ads or show their ads on violent programs. Don't buy toys that encourage or glorify violence. The only sound that penetrates advertisers avaricious ears is the crinkle of money as you stuff it back into your pocket instead of buying their crap. Try renouncing violence yourself. Stop worshipping it. You can't make a peaceful society out of violent individuals.
Here's an interesting piece on school shootings: The part of the brain that is responsible for impulse control is the prefrontal cortex. Your average school shooter is about 15 years old, an age at which the prefrontal cortex is still immature (it doesn't mature until around age 20), and by age 15 the average American kid has seen some thirty thousand deaths by violence depicted on tv. I'm not counting video games, movies, abusive environments, music with abusive lyrics, or video clips on the news. Great. So your average school shooter's profile is a fifteen-year-old outcast with no impulse control, raised on and inured to violence, with access to weaponry. Remember the phrase "young and impressionable?" We feed our children a steady diet of violence from before they are able to walk, let alone think, and then we have the spiritual audacity to wonder why our children are violent.
How about violent metaphor as part of our everyday language? Remember, "Honestly Ward, sometimes I could just shoot the Beaver?" How about that cunningly titled sitcom, "Just Shoot Me?" Or "knockin' 'em dead", "yer killin' me", "it's war out there", et al. Just try getting through a day without metaphorically killing someone. You don't think that words mean anything? That they're just harmless phrases? Wrong. It all adds up. And the final tally is in bodies.
As much as it pains me, there is good news. Our live concert album hit the stores last week, and it's up on Amazon's top 100. Cool.
Copyright © 2001, Barry Carl

Press here

Broodings from Bear - 2002
Broodings from Bear - 2001
Broodings from Bear - 2000
Broodings from Bear - 1999
Broodings from Bear - 1998
Broodings from Bear - 1997

Last update: December 8, 2001
Created and maintained by Bob Parnes
Please send your comments to: